Photo motor bell

Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.897m 39s7m 32s waiting on the model7 builds, 3 failed

Reference
iso
front
back
top
bottom
left
right

75of 100

built: 55
geometry: 100
AI judge: 3 of 7

What the AI judge checked

Pass:The overall form matches the reference: the same kind of object, the same silhouette from the matching angle, allowing for the requested change: the photograph shows only part of the bell; compare the visible part and expect the rest to repeat it six-fold
- Opus 5.5: pass: The renders show an open-bottomed cylindrical can with a six-spoked top face and a central boss, matching the bell in the photo repeated six-fold.
- GPT-6 Sol: pass: The renders show a six-spoked, open-bottomed motor bell with the same overall circular silhouette as the visible portion of the reference.
Pass:Proportions match: the relative sizes of the major dimensions agree with the reference within what the eye can judge, allowing for the requested change: the photograph shows only part of the bell; compare the visible part and expect the rest to repeat it six-fold
- Opus 5.5: pass: The boss spans about 0.43 of the outer diameter and the can is roughly three times wider than tall, consistent with the reference and the stated dimensions.
- GPT-6 Sol: pass: The boss, rim, spokes, and wall height appear proportionate to the dimensions and visible features in the reference.
Fail:Every major feature visible in the reference (holes, slots, bosses, tabs, lips) is present in the result, allowing for the requested change: the photograph shows only part of the bell; compare the visible part and expect the rest to repeat it six-foldAI judges disagreed
- Opus 5.5: pass: The central boss, centre bore, six spokes, forked thin arms, rim and side-wall openings are all visible.
- GPT-6 Sol: fail: The reference’s curved openings continuing down the outer wall are missing; the renders show separate rectangular side windows instead.
Fail:Those features sit where the reference has them, allowing for the requested change: the photograph shows only part of the bell; compare the visible part and expect the rest to repeat it six-foldAI judges disagreed
- Opus 5.5: pass: The top view shows a spoke along the horizontal axis, with forks near the rim and wall openings aligned with each spoke fork, as in the photo.
- GPT-6 Sol: fail: The side openings sit below the rim rather than continuing from the forked arms at the rim as shown in the reference.
Fail:Nothing is present that the reference does not show — no decorative or unexplained geometry, allowing for the requested change: the photograph shows only part of the bell; compare the visible part and expect the rest to repeat it six-foldAI judges disagreed
- Opus 5.5: pass: No extra decorative or unexplained geometry appears beyond the spoked face, the boss and bore, and the wall openings.
- GPT-6 Sol: fail: The large rounded-rectangular windows in the outer wall are not shown in the reference.
Pass:Each spoke splits into two thin arms that curve into the rim, the way the photo shows — not straight spokes and not round holes
- Opus 5.5: pass: Each spoke ends in a rounded Y-fork whose two thin arms curve outward to meet the rim, as seen in the top and isometric views.
- GPT-6 Sol: pass: Each of the six spokes visibly divides into two thin, curved arms near the rim.
Fail:The arms' arcs continue down the outer wall as openings in the side of the canAI judges disagreed
- Opus 5.5: pass: The side views show rounded openings cut into the outer wall at each fork location, continuing the arcs down the side of the can.
- GPT-6 Sol: fail: The curved arms end at the rim, while separate rounded-rectangular openings occupy the side wall.

Measured

✓ watertight: ok
✓ one sub-part named bell: ok
✓ outer diameter is 91 mm: ok
✓ height is 28.77 mm: ok
✓ the can is hollow: ok
✓ the boss is solid around the bore: ok
✓ the bore clears 8 mm: ok
✓ the end face is mostly open: ok
✓ six spoke roots: ok
✓ six windows between the spokes: ok
✓ every spoke forks before the rim: ok

Loading the transcript…

This is an older run. See the current results.

Run kimi31-vs-sonnet2026-11-05commit 0f156dfaspend $12.07 + $2.76 AI judgingOther runs: 2026-11-05T06-56-21-kimi31-sonnet-hard, 2026-10-16T18-49-10-hard-compact-2026-10-16, 2026-09-23T06-56-16-hard-baseline-2026-09-23, 2026-09-10T19-44-23-baseline-2026-09, 2026-09-04T20-02-10-stage2-hard-cases, 2026-09-04T19-48-31-screen-14-fixed