Mesh holder holes

GPT-6 Sol, effort high$0.171m 14s1m 11s waiting on the model4 builds, 1 failed

Reference
iso
front
back
top
bottom
left
right

91of 100

built: 85
geometry: 91
AI judge: 7 of 7

What the AI judge checked

Pass:The overall form matches the reference: the same kind of object, the same silhouette from the matching angle, allowing for the requested change: the holder scaled up ten times to real size, otherwise unchanged, with two through-holes added in the floor of the channel
- Opus 5.5: pass: The renders show the same U-channel holder with bowed side walls, identical silhouettes to the reference in all matching views.
- GPT-6 Sol: pass: The result has the same long, open-channel silhouette as the reference, with two holes added to the channel floor.
Pass:Proportions match: the relative sizes of the major dimensions agree with the reference within what the eye can judge, allowing for the requested change: the holder scaled up ten times to real size, otherwise unchanged, with two through-holes added in the floor of the channel
- Opus 5.5: pass: End, top, bottom and side views match the reference proportions exactly, consistent with uniform scaling.
- GPT-6 Sol: pass: The channel width, wall height, and overall length appear to retain the reference proportions.
Pass:Every major feature visible in the reference (holes, slots, bosses, tabs, lips) is present in the result, allowing for the requested change: the holder scaled up ten times to real size, otherwise unchanged, with two through-holes added in the floor of the channel
- Opus 5.5: pass: The channel, tapered lead-in, central V-notches on the lips and rounded edges are all present as in the reference.
- GPT-6 Sol: pass: The open channel, rounded outer edges, bowed walls, and narrowed section at the channel’s midpoint remain visible.
Pass:Those features sit where the reference has them, allowing for the requested change: the holder scaled up ten times to real size, otherwise unchanged, with two through-holes added in the floor of the channel
- Opus 5.5: pass: The notches, channel and wall profile sit in the same positions as in the reference views.
- GPT-6 Sol: pass: The wall contours and midpoint narrowing occupy the same positions as in the reference.
Pass:Nothing is present that the reference does not show — no decorative or unexplained geometry, allowing for the requested change: the holder scaled up ten times to real size, otherwise unchanged, with two through-holes added in the floor of the channel
- Opus 5.5: pass: Apart from the two requested holes, no additional geometry appears in any view.
- GPT-6 Sol: pass: No added geometry is visible beyond the two requested holes.
Pass:The holder is the imported shape unchanged — the slightly bowed side walls and the open channel are as in the reference — apart from the two holes
- Opus 5.5: pass: The bowed side walls and open channel are visually identical to the reference, with the only difference being the two holes.
- GPT-6 Sol: pass: The slightly bowed side walls and open channel appear unchanged apart from the holes.
Pass:Two round holes go through the floor of the channel on its centreline, one near each end, and nothing else was cut
- Opus 5.5: pass: The top view shows two round holes on the channel centreline at about a quarter of the length from each end, and the bottom view confirms they pass through, with no other cuts.
- GPT-6 Sol: pass: Two round holes are visible on the channel floor’s centreline, approximately one quarter of the length from each end, and the underside view shows they pass through.

Measured

✓ watertight: true == true
✓ one sub-part named holder: ok
✓ the imported holder is still declared as an import: ok
✓ the mesh was scaled to real size: ok
✓ the holder's own volume survives: ok
✓ nothing solid was added inside the holder's own footprint: ok
✓ the +Y hole clears 4.5 mm through the floor: ok
✓ the -Y hole clears 4.5 mm through the floor: ok
✓ the floor is still there around the +Y hole: ok
✓ the floor is still there around the -Y hole: ok
✗ measured the mesh with the oracle: predicate returned false

Loading the transcript…

Run hard-compact-2026-10-162026-10-16commit 6fa9f854spend $116.04 + $54.69 AI judging, 1 unpricedOther runs: 2026-11-05T06-56-21-kimi31-sonnet-hard, 2026-11-05T05-50-12-kimi31-vs-sonnet, 2026-09-23T06-56-16-hard-baseline-2026-09-23, 2026-09-10T19-44-23-baseline-2026-09, 2026-09-04T20-02-10-stage2-hard-cases, 2026-09-04T19-48-31-screen-14-fixed