Phone stand

Opus 5, effort high—10m 0s10m 0s waiting on the model2 builds

iso
front
back
top
bottom
left
right

93of 100

built: 100
geometry: 100
AI judge: 4 of 6

What the AI judge checked

Pass:A back rest that is tilted, not vertical and not flat
- Opus 4.8: pass: The side profile shows a back rest tilted at roughly 60-70 degrees, neither vertical nor flat.
- GPT-5.6 Sol: pass: The side renders clearly show a back rest inclined between vertical and horizontal.
Pass:A lip along the front edge that would stop a phone sliding off
- Opus 4.8: pass: The side views clearly show a raised lip at the front edge to catch the phone's bottom edge.
- GPT-5.6 Sol: pass: A raised lip is clearly visible along the front edge of the phone-supporting channel.
Pass:A base wide enough that the stand would not tip with a phone on it
- Opus 4.8: pass: The base extends well forward and back of the rest, providing a wide stable footprint.
- GPT-5.6 Sol: pass: The base extends broadly behind the inclined rest and spans the full stand width, providing a visibly stable footprint.
Fail:The rest is at least as wide as a 75 mm phoneAI judges disagreed
- Opus 4.8: pass: The front and top views show the rest spans the full width of the base, ample for a 75mm phone.
- GPT-5.6 Sol: fail: The renders provide no dimensions or scale confirming that the rest is at least 75 mm wide.
Pass:One connected body with no floating or detached geometry
- Opus 4.8: pass: All renders show a single continuous connected body with no detached geometry.
- GPT-5.6 Sol: pass: The base, inclined rest, and front lip visibly join into one continuous body with no floating components.
Fail:No decorative or unexplained features beyond rest, lip and baseAI judges disagreed
- Opus 4.8: pass: The part consists only of a rest, lip, and base with no decorative features.
- GPT-5.6 Sol: fail: A central rectangular cutout or notch is visible in an orthographic render and is not explained as part of the rest, lip, or base.

Measured

✓ bbox: [72,85,70.59600067138672] <= [140,140,140]
✓ watertight: true == true
✓ wide enough for a 75mm phone: ok

Loading the transcript…

This is an older run. See the current results.

Run baseline-2026-092026-09-10commit 41aec7daspend $339.70 + $48.02 AI judging, 7 unpricedOther runs: 2026-10-16T18-49-10-hard-compact-2026-10-16, 2026-09-23T06-56-16-hard-baseline-2026-09-23, 2026-09-04T20-02-10-stage2-hard-cases, 2026-09-04T19-48-31-screen-14-fixed